Independent voters have no say in selecting candidates. It doesn’t have to be this way!
In my previous post,” What Really Explains Polarized Elections?” we discussed other voting methods both in practice and in theory including one I called the “bad apple sort.” You can think of this a going through the apple basket throwing out the worst apple until only the prize apple remains.
Now if you’re an independent voter, you may feel the two major parties already sorted through their respective baskets, handed you the worst from each basket and asked you to choose.
You picked the wrong insurance plan. No, I picked the wrong Congress!
On Sunday HHS chief Tom Price said, “I firmly believe that nobody will be worse off financially (under the GOP’s health-care replacement bill).” We’re getting used to listening to what this administration says only to learn later that wasn’t what they really meant, so let’s figure out what he meant. As an economic conservative and long-time Republican I find fewer and fewer things I have in common with the party, but trying to duck responsibility for their own actions makes the top of my list. We know Price didn’t really mean what he said. It must be obvious even to him that if you choose not to buy insurance and then suffer serious medical problems you will be financially worse off. When this doesn’t work out he won’t be able to blame the Democrats. He needs someone else to blame so he’s setting it up to blame you for picking the wrong plan. What he really meant was;
Nobody will be worse off financially,… if they picked the right plan.
Are “unfavorable” and “trade deficit” just words economists use to describe what they are measuring or should we heed the negative connotation attached to these words?
Certainly President Trump thinks an unfavorable balance of trade is a bad thing. You probably do too. But what if we called it “favorable balance of goods and services” instead? Would you still feel the same way? Continue reading
What kind of choices do you want to have to make?
House Speaker Paul Ryan said, “What we’re proposing is a patient-centered system where patients get to decide what to do.” He says the replacement bill for Obamacare would give consumers the power to choose their own health care plans in a more competitive marketplace. We’ve been taught it’s always better to have choices, but what kind of choices do you really want to make with healthcare. Choices are great when you’re buying a car or a house, because you know how you want to use it. Continue reading
The Kamakaze Mission
In my editorial published September 26, 2013 I characterized the Republican attack on the (then pending) ACA or Obamacare as a “kamikaze mission” because of course the fate of the pilots is the same whether or not they succeed in blowing up Obamacare. Now we get to see how that plays out. While Obamacare has substantially reduced the number of uninsured, it has had little effect on the overall cost of healthcare at around 18% of GDP, which is expected to rise with the aging baby-boomer population. The fact is that healthcare costs in the U.S. have risen far faster than inflation over the last fifty years (not just since Obamacare) while other wealthy nations provide the comparable or better health care at half the cost. Of 17 high-income countries studied by the National Institutes of Health in 2013, the United States had the highest or near-highest prevalence of obesity, car accidents, infant mortality, heart and lung disease, sexually transmitted infections, adolescent pregnancies, injuries, and homicides. On average, a U.S. male can be expected to live almost four fewer years than those in the top-ranked country. A 2014 survey of the healthcare systems of 11 developed countries found the US healthcare system to be the most expensive and worst-performing in terms of health access, efficiency, and equity. The only conclusions we can draw from this is up to half of cost of health care in the U.S. is a result of waste and somebody’s getting richer at our expense. And from the number of wrong-headed ideas I’m hearing out of Washington, Congress remains oblivious to the back-door deals creating this waste.
Let the insurance company do it’s job
For example, Kentucky Senator Rand Paul in explaining his plan to replace Obamacare says, “There’s no reason why (a business owner) with four employees shouldn’t be able to join with hundreds and hundreds of other businesses that are small to become a large entity to get leverage to bring your prices down.” Paul is a physician and I’m sure he knows medicine, but he doesn’t know insurance. I’m sure the arguments the insurance lobby gave him for letting them contract with such groups were very convincing; I’ve heard them all.
As someone who spent 30 years in insurance and served as COO of an insurance company I can tell you, “There’s no reason why (a business owner) with four employees should have to join with hundreds and hundreds of other businesses that are small to become a large entity to get leverage to bring your prices down.” It makes no more sense than saying the only way to get affordable homeowner’s coverage is to join with hundreds and hundreds of other homeowners to become a large entity to get leverage to bring your prices down.”
If we could do that we wouldn’t need insurance.
Using the law of large numbers to spread the risk is the health insurance company’s job, not ours. Continue reading
My letter to my representative.
Honorable Senator Grassley,
A life-long Republican, I am asking this on behalf of all your constituents regardless of party affiliation. We deserve a clear answer.
My niece, Arianne Zucker who plays a lead role on the soap, “Days of Our Lives” greeted Donald Trump when he arrived on the their set in 2005. Sure I was offended when I heard him say, “When you’re a star they’ll let you do anything …Grab ’em by the pussy. You can do anything.” But we all know he wasn’t talking about my niece per se or just pretty girls or even women in general. Don’t let this seventh grade locker-room talk overshadow his real message.
“When you’re a star they’ll (everyone will) let you do anything.”
Is he right? Will you let him do anything? Will Congress let him do anything?
I recognize but two religions, Atheists and Liars and I prefer the company of Liars, for it is they who weave the fabric that binds us all together. The time has come for Liars to step up.
Set aside those beliefs that would tear us farther apart and build on those that will make us whole again. You know the difference so stand up, join together and make your voices heard.
I can’t hear you!!!
Wow! I didn’t expect anyone to actually come right out and say it. It’s something that’s bothered me for a long time. But during the July 13th broadcast of “CNN Newsroom,” Ebony Magazine Senior Editor Jamilah Lemieux stated that she disagreed with (President Obama’s) characterizing the shooting of Dallas police officers as a hate crime and using that term for “a group of people that have a history with African-Americans that have been abusive, and we can apply that to either police officers or to Caucasians, I think, gets into very tricky territory.”
Of course that isn’t what the law says. But the tricky territory she’s talking about is how we all perceive the law. For most of us we may say Civil Rights but we hear Black Rights. Despite the awkward euphemisms her message is clear, “Whites can’t be the victims of a hate crime because they are the bad guys.” She sees the law as a kind of declaration dividing Americans into two classifications, “the haters” and “the hated.” What bothers me is I see the law that way too. Now if an old white guy like me and a young black activist woman share the same perception of the law, perhaps everyone in between does too.
That would go a long way in explaining why we can’t heal old wounds.